Strategy Note /
Global

Lack of EU-Russia gas sanctions makes it hard to corral India and others

  • EU-Russia gas sanctions held back by varying EU exposure: Russian gas is 0% of energy supply for Spain but 19% for Italy

  • Coal is banned but not gas, let alone oil: 47% of EU coal comes from Russia but coal's only 8% of total energy imports

  • Economics limit the sanctions on Russia resulting from EU moral outrage, so what chance persuading India et al. to join?

Lack of EU-Russia gas sanctions makes it hard to corral India and others
Hasnain Malik
Hasnain Malik

Strategy & Head of Equity Research

Tellimer Research
6 April 2022
Published by

Significant oil and gas sanctions remain the missing piece from the EU's expanding list of sanctions on Russia, which now include Russian coal. The economic pain the EU is willing to endure continues to limit how much of its moral outrage over the Ukraine invasion is translating into sanctions on Russia.

The implications are that Russia can prosecute its war for longer and that the 'West' will find it hard to bring countries such as India, and the 27% of countries that did not support the UN resolution condemning Russia on 2 March, into its camp.

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz's words at the end of March that any immediate Russia fossil fuels embargo "from one day to the next would mean plunging our country and the whole of Europe into a recession" echo as loudly, in practical terms, as the omission of any reference to Russian involvement in atrocities in Bucha, Ukraine, during the 5 April meeting of the UN Security Council by representatives of India (TS Tirumurti) and China (Zhang Jun).

Whether India or China, or the other countries attempting to tread a 'neutral path', should adopt, at least, a more condemning tone of Russia in their rhetoric is another question.

EU ban on Russian coal, not oil and gas

The exclusion of oil and gas sanctions, thus far, conveys that for all the rhetorical moral outrage over Russia-Ukraine conveyed by leaders across the EU, except for Hungary, there is a limit to the economic pain the EU is willing to endure in its imposition of sanctions on Russia.

The EU ban on Russian coal imports, announced on 5 April, sounds impactful. After all, almost half of the EU's coal imports are sourced from Russia. The coal commodity price in Europe is up over 15% since before these new sanctions were announced.

Coal commodity price in Europe up 6% after EU sanctions on Russia announced on 5 April and up 74% ytd

However, coal accounts for under 10% of total EU energy imports. In contrast, crude oil and natural gas imports from Russia account for c45% and 30%, respectively.

EU-Russia energy sanctions restricted, so far, to coal as economic costs limit the impact of moral outrage on Ukraine

In turn, the exposure to imports of Russian gas, which is less fungible than crude oil given dedicated gas pipeline infrastructure and lack of alternative LNG regasification infrastructure, varies widely across European countries.

Russian gas imports exposure varies widely in Europe

Clearly, the cost of translating moral outrage on Ukraine to sanctions on Russian gas imports varies proportionately to this exposure. It is much more economically costly for Italy, Hungary or Germany to support sanctions on Russian gas than for Spain or Sweden, irrespective of the moral position of their political leaders and societies.

Latest EU sanctions package

The proposed fifth package of EU sanctions announced on 5 April include:

  1. Import ban on coal from Russia;

  2. Full transaction ban on four Russian banks that, in aggregate, account for almost one-quarter of Russia's banking system;

  3. Ban on Russian vessels entering EU ports and for Russian road transport operators, but with exemptions for food and energy;

  4. Export bans on certain industrial products, such as quantum computers and advanced semiconductors, to Russia;

  5. Import bans covering sectors specific to Russian oligarchs (eg wood, cement, seafood and liquor); and

  6. Ban on Russia companies participating in public procurement in the EU.

The EU states it is still working on potential oil sanctions.

Related reading

Geopolitical and ESG risk

US, Europe, China: A Tripolar World hastened by the Russia-Ukraine War, March 2022

Russia-Ukraine War: Glimmer of hope amid scepticism, seismic changes to last, March 2022

Military spend and conflict after Russia-Ukraine, February 2022

China-Taiwan impact from Russia-Ukraine, February 2022

Why India abstained on the Russia vote at the UN, March 2022

US dollar still the dominant reserve currency – Russia sanctions confirm this, March 2022

When countries behave badly: The tortuous morality of ESG investing, March 2022

Commodities

Russian oil embargo impact, March 2022

Food prices hit all-time peak after Russia-Ukraine spike, March 2022

Oil importer alarm bells ring, January 2022

Emerging market commodities hedge, February 2022

Commodities back on top of Technology in EM after 2 years, February 2022

International Energy Agency calls time on Oil, May 2021

Russia

The countries exposed to Russia's economic crisis, March 2022

Russia in ruins in 8 charts, February 2022

Russia's end game: Autarky if no de-escalation, February 2022

Russia will dominate energy security until the grid is fit for renewables (Domjan), March 2022

Russian debt default now inevitable (Culverhouse), March 2022

Russia escalates in Ukraine, boosts all EM commodity plays, February 2022